This fixed example uses a fictional candidate and job description. It shows how ATSTune separates a score, located text evidence, missing evidence, and AI-assisted wording that still requires the candidate’s confirmation.
Evidence gaps found
Useful as a baseline, not an employer pass score.
Fictional candidate
Target: Product Manager
What the number says
The resume supports part of the role, but important product experimentation and measurable outcome evidence is missing.
What it does not say
It does not predict an interview, reproduce an employer’s ATS configuration, or certify that the candidate is qualified.
Best next action
Connect the highest-priority requirements to truthful experience before adding more standalone keywords.
Located evidence
Experience · Product Analyst
“Partnered with product and engineering to prioritize a six-month roadmap for the onboarding journey.”
Skills and Experience
“Used SQL to investigate activation drop-off and define the weekly funnel review.”
Projects · Activation discovery
“Synthesized 12 customer interviews into three onboarding opportunities for the product team.”
Evidence gaps
The target job asks for experiment design, but the resume does not describe a hypothesis, test, decision, or measured result.
Next step: Add a real experiment with the decision and outcome, or leave the requirement as a gap.
“A/B testing” appears in the skills list, but no experience or project bullet shows how it was applied.
Next step: Connect the skill to a truthful project instead of repeating the keyword.
Recent work describes activities but does not state a verifiable change in adoption, revenue, cost, speed, or quality.
Next step: Add an accurate outcome if one is known; do not invent a metric.
Suppose an optimization draft adds the sentence below because roadmap leadership is important to the target job. The source resume does not explicitly support the full claim, so the item remains pending.
Pending statement
“Led quarterly roadmap planning across product and engineering teams.”
Review question: Did you personally lead this planning cycle, and which teams participated?
Confirm
The candidate confirms that the statement reflects real experience.
Edit
The candidate revises the wording to match what actually happened.
Remove
The unsupported statement is deleted or marked not applicable.
Export blocked: the resume cannot be exported while this item remains pending. The candidate must confirm, edit, or remove it and then make a separate overall accuracy confirmation.
Evidence before confidence
Get a private report with located keyword evidence, missing requirements, and prioritized recommendations.
Start free